Welcome!

Containers Expo Blog Authors: Liz McMillan, Pat Romanski, Yeshim Deniz, Elizabeth White, Zakia Bouachraoui

Related Topics: Containers Expo Blog

Containers Expo Blog: Blog Post

The Problem with SLA Monitoring in Virtualized Environments

The time-keeping problem and how it impacts application performance

Because virtual machines work by time-sharing host physical hardware, a virtual machine cannot exactly duplicate the timing behaviour of a physical machine. This leads to the timekeeping problems explained in the VMWare White Paper about Timekeeping in Virtual Machines that results in inaccurate time measurements within the virtual machine. This affects ALL performance metrics that rely on the operating system clock time to keep track of time which includes system counters like CPU or I/O Utilization. Performance Management solutions therefore run into the problem that the monitored metrics are inaccurate and can lead to incorrect enforcement of SLAs or wrong assumptions about application performance.

This blog explains the time keeping problem, how it impacts Application Performance Management in virtualized environments and what can be done to solve this problem.

Time keeping problem explained

Operating Systems that use a Tick Counting approach to keep track of time use hardware interrupts to count how many ticks have occurred since the system started. In a virtualized environment these interrupts are consumed by the virtualization infrastructure which keeps track of what we call the “Real Time”. The interrupts are then forwarded to the hosted virtual machines which itself keep track of the time that we call “Apparent Time“. In the best case scenario Real Time and Apparent Time are the same:

Timekeeping - Phase 1 - Real and Apparent Time are the same

Timekeeping - Phase 1 - Real and Apparent Time are the same

A virtual machine is not “always on” as it gets descheduled by the virtual server because of time-sharing with other virtual machines. In that time the hardware interrupts cannot be handled by the virtual machine and are therefore put into a queue for later consumption.

Timekeeping - Phase 2 - Virtual Machine is descheduled

Timekeeping - Phase 2 - Virtual Machine is descheduled

At the time the Virtual Machine gets scheduled again the operating system’s Apparent Time is still the time it was before it got descheduled as it has not yet received the timer interrupts that happened in the meantime. In that case the Apparent Time has drifted from the Real Time. Impact: Any performance metric taken at this time only shows the time that the Virtual Machine believes had passed which is not the time that really passed.

Over time the Virtual Machine catches up with the interrupts it missed while descheduled.

 

Timekeeping - Phase 3 - Catching up with Time
Timekeeping – Phase 3 – Catching up with Time

There are several other techniques that virtualization environments use to bring the Apparent Time back to Real Time as fast as possible. For more details have a look at the VMWare White Paper as mentioned on the top of this blog.

Impacts of the Time Keeping Problem

Any time based metrics captured from within the Virtual Machine are subject to the timekeeping problem including CPU Utilization, Memory Allocations per time interval, I/O access per time interval,… and any custom time tracking that can be used for e.g.: response time or transaction time monitoring. Operating system counters like % CPU per process also runs into another interesting problem where individual processes might get charged incorrectly with time that they never consumed. After a Virtual Machine is resumed the queued timer interrupts are processed. These interrupts come in a faster rate than normal. The currently active processes are charged with all these timing events although they have not done any work in that time because they were actually descheduled.

You can see that the timekeeping issue can really mess up your performance counters. The more load you have on a virtual server, the more virtual machines there are to schedule and de-schedule – the higher the impact on accurate timing will be. Other side effects like over-provisioning of CPU or Memory have an impact as well.

Using performance metrics from within the Virtual Machine for application performance management and enforcement of Service Level Agreements is therefore very questionable as the results are not accurate and not predictable.

Accurate Time Keeping with Pseudo Performance Counters

VMWare is aware of this problem and explains in great detail the reasons and the effects in their White Paper. As a solution for performance management solutions VMWare provides a way to query the actual Real Time at any time from within the Virtual Machine. Pseudo Performance Counters are made available via virtual processor registers that can be accessed from any application within the Virtual Machine.

dynaTrace is using these new counters for accurate time measurement when Managing Application Performance in virtualized VMWare environments. This allows accurate SLA enforcement and application performance management down to individual transactions or even methods. The following illustration shows a single captured transaction with accurate timings. dynaTrace captures the Real and the Apparent Time on method and transaction level:

 

Accurate Timing on Transaction and Method Level
Accurate Timing on Transaction and Method Level

Capturing the Real Time values and also showing the Apparent Time Drift enables Application Performance Management with accurate timing values. Accurate timings are the basics for accurate SLA Enforcement in Production as well as Application Performance Monitoring.

Is timekeeping a real issue in your environment?

The timekeeping problem is well known within the VMWare community and brings challenges to accurate application performance management in virtualized environments. I am interested in your experience with this problem. Have you been aware of it? Do you live with the inaccuracy or do you have other approaches for accurate measuring? Please share your thoughts on this topic.

More Stories By Andreas Grabner

Andreas Grabner has been helping companies improve their application performance for 15+ years. He is a regular contributor within Web Performance and DevOps communities and a prolific speaker at user groups and conferences around the world. Reach him at @grabnerandi

IoT & Smart Cities Stories
The deluge of IoT sensor data collected from connected devices and the powerful AI required to make that data actionable are giving rise to a hybrid ecosystem in which cloud, on-prem and edge processes become interweaved. Attendees will learn how emerging composable infrastructure solutions deliver the adaptive architecture needed to manage this new data reality. Machine learning algorithms can better anticipate data storms and automate resources to support surges, including fully scalable GPU-c...
Machine learning has taken residence at our cities' cores and now we can finally have "smart cities." Cities are a collection of buildings made to provide the structure and safety necessary for people to function, create and survive. Buildings are a pool of ever-changing performance data from large automated systems such as heating and cooling to the people that live and work within them. Through machine learning, buildings can optimize performance, reduce costs, and improve occupant comfort by ...
The explosion of new web/cloud/IoT-based applications and the data they generate are transforming our world right before our eyes. In this rush to adopt these new technologies, organizations are often ignoring fundamental questions concerning who owns the data and failing to ask for permission to conduct invasive surveillance of their customers. Organizations that are not transparent about how their systems gather data telemetry without offering shared data ownership risk product rejection, regu...
René Bostic is the Technical VP of the IBM Cloud Unit in North America. Enjoying her career with IBM during the modern millennial technological era, she is an expert in cloud computing, DevOps and emerging cloud technologies such as Blockchain. Her strengths and core competencies include a proven record of accomplishments in consensus building at all levels to assess, plan, and implement enterprise and cloud computing solutions. René is a member of the Society of Women Engineers (SWE) and a m...
Poor data quality and analytics drive down business value. In fact, Gartner estimated that the average financial impact of poor data quality on organizations is $9.7 million per year. But bad data is much more than a cost center. By eroding trust in information, analytics and the business decisions based on these, it is a serious impediment to digital transformation.
Digital Transformation: Preparing Cloud & IoT Security for the Age of Artificial Intelligence. As automation and artificial intelligence (AI) power solution development and delivery, many businesses need to build backend cloud capabilities. Well-poised organizations, marketing smart devices with AI and BlockChain capabilities prepare to refine compliance and regulatory capabilities in 2018. Volumes of health, financial, technical and privacy data, along with tightening compliance requirements by...
Predicting the future has never been more challenging - not because of the lack of data but because of the flood of ungoverned and risk laden information. Microsoft states that 2.5 exabytes of data are created every day. Expectations and reliance on data are being pushed to the limits, as demands around hybrid options continue to grow.
Digital Transformation and Disruption, Amazon Style - What You Can Learn. Chris Kocher is a co-founder of Grey Heron, a management and strategic marketing consulting firm. He has 25+ years in both strategic and hands-on operating experience helping executives and investors build revenues and shareholder value. He has consulted with over 130 companies on innovating with new business models, product strategies and monetization. Chris has held management positions at HP and Symantec in addition to ...
Enterprises have taken advantage of IoT to achieve important revenue and cost advantages. What is less apparent is how incumbent enterprises operating at scale have, following success with IoT, built analytic, operations management and software development capabilities - ranging from autonomous vehicles to manageable robotics installations. They have embraced these capabilities as if they were Silicon Valley startups.
As IoT continues to increase momentum, so does the associated risk. Secure Device Lifecycle Management (DLM) is ranked as one of the most important technology areas of IoT. Driving this trend is the realization that secure support for IoT devices provides companies the ability to deliver high-quality, reliable, secure offerings faster, create new revenue streams, and reduce support costs, all while building a competitive advantage in their markets. In this session, we will use customer use cases...