| By Daniel Feller | Article Rating: |
|
| February 3, 2011 05:00 PM EST | Reads: |
1,791 |
I've spent the last month or so discussing the top 10 mistakes seen on desktop virtualization implementation so you can learn from other's mistakes. I've discussed 9 different things so far and they were:
10. Not calculating user bandwidth requirements
9. Not considering the user profile
8. Lack of Application Virtualization Strategy
7. Improper Resource Allocation
5. Managing the incoming storm
4. Not Optimizing the Desktop Image
3. Not using your Cache Wisely
And now it is time for the #1 thing that people mess up with desktop virtualization.
Storage. Actually, this shouldn't be a surprise at all if you pay any attention to the blogosphere. There have been numerous discussions on this exact topic. If you haven't yet, I'd suggest you read the white paper by Ruben Spruijt and Herco Van Brug Storage Deep Impact.
Why all of the confusion and misconfiguration of storage? When it comes to storage, most people think only about size... How much space do I need to allocate per user? With desktop virtualization, storage goes beyond simple size calculations. Virtual desktops rely on the storage infrastructure to load different parts of the operating system and user environment. Each one of the requests impacts the storage infrastructure. Without a properly designed storage subsystem, a user's virtual desktop will slow down to the point of becoming unusable because the storage becomes a bottleneck.
In order to properly design the storage infrastructure, the architect must first be able to calculate the expected Input/Output Operations per Second (IOPS) requirements. The IOPS calculations must take the following into account:
| Parameter | Description | Values |
| Disk Speed | The speed that the disk spins has a direct impact on how fast the disk can read the correct sector. | 15,000 RPM: 150 Random IOPS 10,000 RPM: 110 Random IOPS 5,400 RPM: 50 Random IOPS |
| Read/Write | IOPS are broken down into reads and writes. Certain processes are read intensive while others require more writes. The ratio between reads and writes impacts of the overall IOPS. | It has been shown that most desktop implementations result in the follow read/write ratios:
|
| RAID Level | The RAID configuration impacts how many actual write IOPS are available due to the different types of redundancy in place. The write penalty reduces the overall IOPS for each disk spindle. |
RAID 0: No RAID Penalty RAID 1: Penalty of 2 RAID 10: Penalty of 2 RAID 5 (4 disks): Penalty of 4 |
| Desktop Lifecycle | Each desktop goes through six phases, with each phase incurring different hits on the storage subsystem. | Boot: 26 IOPS Logon: 14 IOPS
Steady State: Light: 4-8 IOPS Normal: 8-12 IOPS Power: 12-25 IOPS Heavy: 25-50 IOPS Idle: 4 IOPS Logoff: 12 IOPS Offline: 0 IOPS |
Taking the six different parameters into account, an architect can calculate the IOPS requirements on a server-by-server basis and for the entire desktop virtualization architecture. The formula is as follows:
Total Raw IOPS=Disk Speed IOPS*# Of Disks
For example, if there are eight 72GB 15K SCSI3 drives in a RAID 10 configuration, the storage would have 720 functional IOPS.
Functional IOPS=(((Total Raw IOPS×Write %))/(RAID Penalty))+(Total Raw IOPS×Read %)
With the functional IOPS calculated for the disk subsystem, the number of desktops that can be supported is based on the phase of the desktop lifecycle. Identifying how many desktops can be simultaneously logged in with this configuration is as follows:
Total Raw IOPS=150×8=1200
Functional IOPS=(((1200× .8))/2)+(1200×.2)= 720
These calculations help identify what is possible when all desktops are doing the same activity. However, this is not likely to be the case. In fact, on each hypervisor, a portion of the desktops will be in one of the defined phases. So you, as the architect, must figure out what each server will require based on the loads experienced by each of the desktops combined. With your calculations, you might even realize you don't need a SAN. You might be able to get by with local storage (as I've spoken about before).
Published February 3, 2011 Reads 1,791
Copyright © 2011 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Daniel Feller
Daniel Feller, Lead Architect of Worldwide Consulting Solutions for Citrix, is responsible for providing enterprise-level architectures and recommendations for those interested in desktop virtualization and VDI. He is charged with helping organizations architect the next-generation desktop, including all flavors of desktop virtualization (hosted shared desktops, hosted VM-based desktops, hosted Blade PC desktops, local streamed desktops, and local VM-based desktops). Many of the desktop virtualization architecture decisions also focuses on client hypervisors, and application virtualization.
In his role, Daniel has provided insights and recommendations to many of the world’s largest organizations across the world.
In addition to private, customer-related work, Daniel’s public initiatives includes the creation of best practices, design recommendations, reference architectures and training initiatives focused on the core desktop virtualization concepts. Being the person behind the scenes, you can reach/follow Daniel via Twitter and on the Virtualize My Desktop site.
- Microsoft’s Second UI Innovation
- What Motivates Open Standards in the Cloud?
- What to Expect in 2012: Cloud Computing and Open Source Software
- End-User Participation to Provide Unique Forum for Peer Collaboration at 2012 Technology Convergence Conference
- Ten Hot Trends in Cloud Data for 2012
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Cloud Expo New York: The Java EE 7 Platform - Developing for the Cloud
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Architectures Require Scale-Out Storage
- Microsoft’s New Cloudware Could Cast a Shadow over VMware
- AT&T Joins OpenStack, Floats Cloud Architect
- Ahead in the Cloud: 2012 Cloud Computing Predictions
- Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies 2011
- Microsoft’s Second UI Innovation
- Cloud Computing: A Comparison of Computing Models
- What Motivates Open Standards in the Cloud?
- Big Data Bug Bites GE
- What to Expect in 2012: Cloud Computing and Open Source Software
- End-User Participation to Provide Unique Forum for Peer Collaboration at 2012 Technology Convergence Conference
- StorSimple Supports OpenStack
- Ten Hot Trends in Cloud Data for 2012
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- HP Expands Its HANA Alliance with SAP
- The Top 150 Players in Cloud Computing
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- FullArmor GPAnywhere Secures Microsoft Application Virtualization Applications Through Group Policy
- SYS-CON's Virtualization Conference & Expo: Themes & Topics
- SYS-CON's Virtualization Journal Opens Its "Readers' Choice Awards" Nominations
- "Virtualization Is Now a Key Strategic Theme," Says Citrix CTO
- Application Virtualization: Instant Migration to Vista, Fast Delivery, Secure Access, Side-by-Side Deployments
- Application Virtualization
- Integration with Windows Vista, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft Application Virtualization
- Will Microsoft Buy Citrix?
- mValent Extends Automated Application Configuration Management to Virtualization Environments
- Has the Technology Bounceback Begun?

















