Welcome!

Virtualization Authors: Miko Matsumura, Yeshim Deniz, Liz McMillan, Chris Fleck, Mark Hamilton

Related Topics: Virtualization

Virtualization: Article

Dell Steals Virtualization March on HP & IBM

Dell One Giant Step Ahead With the Announcement that it is OEMing PAN

Dell will take a big giant step out ahead of HP and IBM in the virtualization sweepstakes when it announces that it is OEMing PAN, Egenera’s data center virtualization and management software.

Egenera, which has been doing virtualization way longer than most people, claims PAN is the epitome of what IDC calls “Virtualization 2.0,” the next step beyond simple VMware-style single server virtualization replete with scalability, faster provisioning, high availability, disaster recovery and resource balancing.

VMware and its hypervisor are bully at virtualizing one server at a time. PAN, on the other hand, takes VMware – or for that matter Xen or Microsoft’s Hyper-V when it finally gets here – it doesn’t care it’s hypervisor-agnostic – and virtualizes the data center, creating networks of virtual and physical servers.

It can move individual servers, groups of servers or entire systems from one place to another seamlessly and securely with verifiable disaster recovery and uptime.

Besides server farms, this little miracle also virtualizes storage and networking too.

While HP makes like its rival Virtual Connect management software is now at the sundae stage lacking only the sprinkles and a cherry, Egenera CTO Peter Manca says HP is “still out milking the cow” and that IBM, which invented virtualization for its mainframes, is “still calving.”

Manca calls HP’s approach “disjointed” and “not integrated,” requiring manual intervention to achieve any, say, SAN failover – and then only on its blade servers, not on the many rack servers it sells.

HP can’t treat physical and virtual servers as if they were the same either, Egenera says; PAN can. It’s supposed to have anywhere from a two- to four-year lead on the market.

Egenera, which continues to sell and enhance its own Pan-integrated BladeFrame servers, decided to port its infrastructure virtualization magic toother people’s x86 machines late last year.

Fujitsu Siemens, which OEMs Egenera’s BladeFrames, was first to take it up on its offer and signed up for PAN on its industry standard Primergy servers.

Both the Dell and Fujitsu Siemens ports should appear on the market at about the same time before the end of this June.

Manca say the ports are pretty much done. Discussions between Dell and Egenera began nine months ago.

Dell’s deal is obviously not exclusive. PAN could still wind up on IBM and HP gear but both are closer rivals of Egenera on the hardware side than Dell is and both have not-invented-here sensitivities.

Dell intends to sell the widgetry on PowerEdge servers initially through its Advanced Solutions unit along with infrastructure consulting services. The widgetry is expected to wend its way to Dell’s channel.

About Maureen O'Gara

Maureen O'Gara the most read technology reporter for the past 20 years, is the Cloud Computing and Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.

Comments (1) View Comments

Share your thoughts on this story.

Add your comment
You must be signed in to add a comment. Sign-in | Register

In accordance with our Comment Policy, we encourage comments that are on topic, relevant and to-the-point. We will remove comments that include profanity, personal attacks, racial slurs, threats of violence, or other inappropriate material that violates our Terms and Conditions, and will block users who make repeated violations. We ask all readers to expect diversity of opinion and to treat one another with dignity and respect.


Most Recent Comments
Jim Babka 03/27/08 06:53:41 PM EDT

First of all, did anyone edit this piece? It was quite difficult to parse the language in some places. More importantly, I have a real problem with generic aspersions being heaped upon IBM with no details. HP suffers a similar fate, but at least there's a general statement about HP's "disjointed" approach. There's no details at all about IBM's virtualization problems.

This comes across as a pure piece of marketing hype for Engenera. The author may be a "well-respected reporter", but with lines like, "... this little miracle...", plus no actual comparison details, she shows a disappointing lack of objectivity.

Full disclosure: I work for IBM, but have nothing to do with any of IBM's virtualization products. This is my personal opinion, and does not reflect the opinion of IBM.