| By Billy Marshall | Article Rating: |
|
| December 12, 2008 02:45 PM EST | Reads: |
4,398 |
I just read an interesting article regarding the potential cost pitfalls associated with VM sprawl. Jett Thompson, an enterprise computing architect from Boeing, has developed a cost model regarding the benefits of virtualization and the related pitfalls of VM sprawl. It seems that virtualization is easy to justify, so long as you don't give the users everything that they want. Here is the money quote from the article:
However, all of those savings [from virtualization] can be eliminated if sprawl isn't controlled. With virtual servers easy to spin up, users may ask for large numbers of new virtual machines and it's up to IT to hold the line, Thompson says.
"If you don't have demand management and good governance in place you're actually going to cost your company money," he says. "Virtual server sprawl can wipe out any savings.
Gartner analyst Thomas Bittman also says virtual server sprawl can be tough to control and is harder to measure than physical server sprawl. "Fundamentally, we believe virtualization sprawl can be a much bigger problem than physical sprawl," Bittman said.
I believe that the unintended consequences of "IT hold[ing] the line" will be rogue cloud deployments. Rogue cloud deployments describe the phenomenon of business unit developers taking matters into their own hands when IT "holds the line" on making computing resources available. Once the business units understand that resources can be made available on-demand, either internally or via services such as Amazon EC2, they are simply not going to take "no" for an answer. Deploying applications as virtual machines, or virtual appliances in the case of an ISV application, removes all of the friction from the deployment process. This same friction was formerly the tonic that IT sprinkled about in order to "hold the line" on availability (and the subsequent management costs) of computing resources. The instant gratification culture that we are cultivating with SaaS and cloud will not be held in check if IT "holds the line" by saying "no" to requests for capacity/capability.
I have a recommendation for Jett and the folks at Boeing and elsewhere who are fearing the unintended consequences of frictionless system capacity brought about by virtualization. Push the control point for deployment policy upstream via automated build, release, and management processes for applications released as virtual machines; manage the scale problem by going vertical with a JeOS architecture; and build a seamless bridge managed by IT to cloud offerings like Amazon EC2. Charge the users with the costs for deployment and management, but give them the technology to do it the right way. Check out our cloud computing adoption model and the webinar that accompanies it. Rogue cloud deployments can be avoided, even in the face of VM sprawl control measures, when you say "yes" to your users while holding them accountable for building manageable system images.
Published December 12, 2008 Reads 4,398
Copyright © 2008 SYS-CON Media, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Billy Marshall
Prior to founding rPath, Billy served as Red Hat's Vice President of North America Sales from 2001 until 2005.Billy conceived and oversaw the launch of Red Hat Network, the platform that enabled Red Hat's subscription revenue model. Billy also worked in IBM Global Services where he worked with global leaders such as Boeing, Ford, Eaton, Mercedes Benz, and Raytheon.
- Microsoft’s Second UI Innovation
- What Motivates Open Standards in the Cloud?
- StorSimple Supports OpenStack
- What to Expect in 2012: Cloud Computing and Open Source Software
- Ten Hot Trends in Cloud Data for 2012
- End-User Participation to Provide Unique Forum for Peer Collaboration at 2012 Technology Convergence Conference
- HP Expands Its HANA Alliance with SAP
- Three Buzzwords That Every CIO Hears but One They Should Listen To
- Write Once Run Anywhere or Cross Platform Mobile Development Tools
- Microsoft’s New Cloudware Could Cast a Shadow over VMware
- Cloud Expo New York: Cloud Architectures Require Scale-out Storage
- AT&T Joins OpenStack, Floats Cloud Architect
- The Future of Cloud Computing: Industry Predictions for 2012
- HP Puts Activist Shareholder on Board
- Gartner Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies 2011
- Microsoft’s Second UI Innovation
- Cloud Computing: A Comparison of Computing Models
- What Motivates Open Standards in the Cloud?
- Big Data Bug Bites GE
- StorSimple Supports OpenStack
- What to Expect in 2012: Cloud Computing and Open Source Software
- Apprenda Upgrades Its .NET Private PaaS
- Ten Hot Trends in Cloud Data for 2012
- Cloud Expo Takeaways: Cloud Confusion Still Exists
- The Top 150 Players in Cloud Computing
- Where Are RIA Technologies Headed in 2008?
- FullArmor GPAnywhere Secures Microsoft Application Virtualization Applications Through Group Policy
- SYS-CON's Virtualization Conference & Expo: Themes & Topics
- SYS-CON's Virtualization Journal Opens Its "Readers' Choice Awards" Nominations
- "Virtualization Is Now a Key Strategic Theme," Says Citrix CTO
- Application Virtualization: Instant Migration to Vista, Fast Delivery, Secure Access, Side-by-Side Deployments
- Application Virtualization
- Integration with Windows Vista, Microsoft Excel, and Microsoft Application Virtualization
- Will Microsoft Buy Citrix?
- mValent Extends Automated Application Configuration Management to Virtualization Environments
- Has the Technology Bounceback Begun?



















