YOUR FEEDBACK
AMD Wants To Depose 486 People in Intel Case
AMD News Desk wrote: Contrary to what you may have read elsewhere, AMD has...
SOA World Conference
Virtualization Conference
$200 Savings Expire May 16, 2008... – Register Today!

SYS-CON.TV
TODAY'S TOP SOA & WEBSERVICES LINKS


Dell Steals Virtualization March on HP & IBM
Dell One Giant Step Ahead With the Announcement that it is OEMing PAN

Digg This!

Dell will take a big giant step out ahead of HP and IBM in the virtualization sweepstakes when it announces that it is OEMing PAN, Egenera’s data center virtualization and management software.

Egenera, which has been doing virtualization way longer than most people, claims PAN is the epitome of what IDC calls “Virtualization 2.0,” the next step beyond simple VMware-style single server virtualization replete with scalability, faster provisioning, high availability, disaster recovery and resource balancing.

VMware and its hypervisor are bully at virtualizing one server at a time. PAN, on the other hand, takes VMware – or for that matter Xen or Microsoft’s Hyper-V when it finally gets here – it doesn’t care it’s hypervisor-agnostic – and virtualizes the data center, creating networks of virtual and physical servers.

It can move individual servers, groups of servers or entire systems from one place to another seamlessly and securely with verifiable disaster recovery and uptime.

Besides server farms, this little miracle also virtualizes storage and networking too.

While HP makes like its rival Virtual Connect management software is now at the sundae stage lacking only the sprinkles and a cherry, Egenera CTO Peter Manca says HP is “still out milking the cow” and that IBM, which invented virtualization for its mainframes, is “still calving.”

Manca calls HP’s approach “disjointed” and “not integrated,” requiring manual intervention to achieve any, say, SAN failover – and then only on its blade servers, not on the many rack servers it sells.

HP can’t treat physical and virtual servers as if they were the same either, Egenera says; PAN can. It’s supposed to have anywhere from a two- to four-year lead on the market.

Egenera, which continues to sell and enhance its own Pan-integrated BladeFrame servers, decided to port its infrastructure virtualization magic toother people’s x86 machines late last year.

Fujitsu Siemens, which OEMs Egenera’s BladeFrames, was first to take it up on its offer and signed up for PAN on its industry standard Primergy servers.

Both the Dell and Fujitsu Siemens ports should appear on the market at about the same time before the end of this June.

Manca say the ports are pretty much done. Discussions between Dell and Egenera began nine months ago.

Dell’s deal is obviously not exclusive. PAN could still wind up on IBM and HP gear but both are closer rivals of Egenera on the hardware side than Dell is and both have not-invented-here sensitivities.

Dell intends to sell the widgetry on PowerEdge servers initially through its Advanced Solutions unit along with infrastructure consulting services. The widgetry is expected to wend its way to Dell’s channel.

About Maureen O'Gara
Maureen O'Gara is the Virtualization News Desk editor of SYS-CON Media. She is the publisher of famous "Billygrams" and the editor-in-chief of "Client/Server News" for more than a decade. One of the most respected technology reporters in the business, Maureen can be reached by email at maureen(at)sys-con.com or paperboy(at)g2news.com, and by phone at 516 759-7025.

Jim Babka wrote: First of all, did anyone edit this piece? It was quite difficult to parse the language in some places. More importantly, I have a real problem with generic aspersions being heaped upon IBM with no details. HP suffers a similar fate, but at least there's a general statement about HP's "disjointed" approach. There's no details at all about IBM's virtualization problems. This comes across as a pure piece of marketing hype for Engenera. The author may be a "well-respected reporter", but with lines like, "... this little miracle...", plus no actual comparison details, she shows a disappointing lack of objectivity. Full disclosure: I work for IBM, but have nothing to do with any of IBM's virtualization products. This is my personal opinion, and does not reflect the opinion of IBM.
read & respond »
SUBSCRIBE TO THE WORLD'S MOST POWERFUL NEWSLETTERS
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR RSS FEEDS & GET YOUR SYS-CON NEWS LIVE!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021

SYS-CON FEATURED WHITEPAPERS


ADS BY GOOGLE